Legal Opinion
Bateman v. South Carolina State Ports Authority
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 17, 1969No. Civ. A. 69-217PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek adjudication, in this forum, of (1) a class action allegedly instituted to protect constitutional prerogatives, using the Civil Rights Act of 1871 1 as a vehicle, and (2) money damages in the amount of $2,000,000 plus attorneys’ fees and costs. Collateral, but claimed as vital, are requests for equitable relief specified as:
(A) An Order of Injunction directing the Defendents to cease discrimiinating against members of the said class because of membership in a labor organization, and because of union activity.
(B) An Order of Injunction compelling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Stefanelli v. MinardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atkins v. City of CharlotteDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luker v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- James v. OgilvieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- Confederation of Police v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- Teamsters Loc. U. No. 822 v. City of Portsmouth, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- Branch v. City of Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.