Suessenbach v. First Nat. Bank
Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota
Appeal from district court of Lawrence county; Hon. Charles M. Thomas, Judge. That the court erred in admitting in evidence tbe proceedings had in the land-office, and admitting the rules and regulations of the mining district, see Silver Mining Co. v. Brown, 10 Sawy. 246; Smelting Go. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 640, 641; Steele v. Smelting Co., 106 U. S. 450-455; Quinby v. Conlan, 104 U. S. 420; 'Lilton v. Cojield, 93 U. S. 163; Uligh v. Garrison, 2 Dak. 71, 2 N. W. Eep. 99; French…
Read the full summary
Appeal from district court of Lawrence county; Hon. Charles M. Thomas, Judge. That the court erred in admitting in evidence tbe proceedings had in the land-office, and admitting the rules and regulations of the mining district, see Silver Mining Co. v. Brown, 10 Sawy. 246; Smelting Go. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 640, 641; Steele v. Smelting Co., 106 U. S. 450-455; Quinby v. Conlan, 104 U. S. 420; 'Lilton v. Cojield, 93 U. S. 163; Uligh v. Garrison, 2 Dak. 71, 2 N. W. Eep. 99; French v. Lancaster, 2 Dak. 346, 9 N. W. Eep. 716; Golden Lerra M. Co. v. Smith, 2 Dak. 462, 11 N. W. Eep. 97; Kendall v. San…
1Opinion of the CourtOakland, J.
This action was brought in the district court of Lawrence county by the appellants to recover the possession of a parcel of land situate, lying, and being in the city of Deadwood, county of Lawrence, territory of Dakota, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the north-east corner of Main and Lee streets; thence running in a north-easterly direction along the line of said Main street 21.5 feet; thence at right angles to said Main street in a north-westerly direction 100 feet to place of beginning, — being lot No. 2, in block No. 3, and a part of mineral claim No. 86, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Estrada v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Noyes v. MantleSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Du Pont v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stevens v. Grand Central Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Kenny v. McKenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Gresens v. MartinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- South End Mining Co. v. TinneyNevada Supreme Court · 1894
- Culver v. GrahamWyoming Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.