Legal Opinion

Harlow v. Swift and Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1973No. 4539PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, Dale Harlow, sued defendant, Swift and Company, for damages allegedly suffered because Swift sold and delivered to plaintiff lamb feed which was unfit for the use for which it was intended. The jury answered all liability issues in favor of defendant. Judgment was, however, entered for plaintiff for $5,973.10. This amount was determined by deducting a sum, owed to Swift by Harlow for feed, from an amount owed to Harlow by Swift for the purchase of lambs. Defendant admitted in its answer it owed the $5,973.10. The judgment further provided that all other…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Barrington v. DuncanTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Flack v. First Nat. Bank of DalhartTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bridges v. City of RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Woon Hur v. City of Mesquite, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  2. Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Parkview General Hospital, Inc. v. Waco Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Horn v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Brungs v. Consolidated Plan Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API