Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Hale-Halsell Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the Moneyweight Scale Company against the Hale-Halsell Grocery Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiif brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
On January 16, 1909, the Moneyweight Scale Company entered into a conditional sale contract with the Porum Grocery Company for the purchase of one computing scale, of the value of $125. This contract retained the title to the scale in the vendor until the purchase price was paid in full. The contract was not filed for record until after the scale had been attached by the Hale-Halsell Grocery Company. This action was brought to recover possession of the scale- by the Moneyweight Scale Company, or for the value thereof, in the sum of $125. At the trial the court refused…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allen v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Hill v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Jones v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Crumrine v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Morton v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Security Nat. Bank v. Truscon Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Commercial Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Ponder v. Beeler Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936