Legal Opinion

Ponder v. Beeler Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1936No. 26248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was commenced by the' plaintiffs in error, R. C. Ponder. W. E. Wilson, and W. P. Dickson, of Elk City, Okla., against the Beeler Motor Company, of Chickasha, Okla., defendant in error, by filing in the district court of Grady county. Okla., an action in replevin for the possession of a certain automobile, and tried on March 7, 1934. The parties are in the same position in this court as they were in the court below, and will be referred to accordingly as plaintiffs and defendant.

The plaintiffs alleged in their petition, in substance: That they sc-ld to one Mr. G. P. Dickson, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. German-American National Bank v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Security Nat. Bank v. Truscon Steel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. TuftsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Hale-Halsell Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Ponder v. Beeler Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Midwestern Acceptance Co. v. Allied Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API