Legal Opinion

People v. Norris

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1954No. Crim. 5128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment of guilty of robbery in the first degree after trial before the court without a jury, defendant appeals. There is also an appeal from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (respondent) the facts are:

On June 6, 1953, defendant, armed with a knife, together with two other men took from the complaining witness, Theodore Bradley, his wallet without his permission.

Questions: First: Was there substantial evidence to support the judgment of guilty?

Yes. The record discloses that Mr. Bradley identified defendant as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Yule v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. GoltraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. GrazianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SheetsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. People v. McGrawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. People v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API