Legal Opinion

Gitchel v. Whipple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Ottawa; Padgham, J. Mandamus by George W. Gitcbel to compel William Whipple, Jr., drain commissioner of Ottawa county, to recognize the action of a board of review in enlarging an assessment district. From an order denying the writ* relator brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

In April, 1898, application was made to the county drain commissioners of Ottawa and Allegan counties to lay out a drain, called the “Black Creek Drain,” through those counties. No question is made but that the proceedings were regular up to and including the letting of the drain and the making of the assessment of benefits. In October, 1899, the county drain commissioner of Ottawa county (the respondent here) made his assessment of benefits for the township of Jamestown. The relator and other freeholders of said township thereupon made application to the probate court for an appeal from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brady v. HaywardMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Attorney General ex rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Sanilac County Drain CommissionerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Huxtable v. KirbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API