Legal Opinion

Claiborne v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Cooke. Tried below before Hon. I). B. Barrett.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS.

HUNTER, Associate Justice

This is a motion by appellee to dis miss the appeal, because the affidavit filed in the District Court, where the cause was tried, “was made before the county judge of Cooke County, and it nowhere appears in the affidavit, in the petition, or elsewhere, that the plaintiff was a resident of that county.”

This motion states the facts. ¡Not even in plaintiff’s petition does he give the county of his residence, nor is it shown in the statement of facts, or in the affidavit, and we approve the suggestion of the counsel that it would be eminently proper…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Herd v. Home Nat. Bank of CleburneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Newburg v. SpinhirneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Roberson v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Grand Leader, Inc. v. Monnig Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API