Legal Opinion

Hay & Forage Industries v. Ford New Holland, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 16, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 88-2197-0PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate.

Under consideration are four motions:

*6891. Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas of Stephen D. Timmons and Victor E. Lowe Under Rule 26(c) (doc. 166).

2. Plaintiff’s Motion Under Rules 30 and 37(a) For an Order Compelling Discovery (doc. 171).

3. Hesston’s Motion to Compel Answers to Hesston’s First Interrogatories and Production of Documents Requested by Hesston’s First Document Request (doc. 175).

4. Counterplaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Rules 37(a) and 36(a), F.R.Civ.P. to Compel Counterdefendants to Answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. N.F.A. Corp. v. Riverview Narrow Fabrics, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
  2. In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shuffle Master, Inc. v. Progressive Games, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kaiser v. Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
  4. Simmons Foods, Inc. v. WillisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  5. United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API