Legal Opinion

Cain v. Lyddon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20113. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sidney Cain, appellee, the owner of certain premises in Rockford, Illinois, applied to Forrest A. Lyddon, appellant, the building commissioner of that city, for a permit to erect a gasoline and oil station thereon. Such use of the property was permissible if it lay within an area zoned for commercial purposes. The permit was denied. Thereupon appellee filed his petition for mandamus in the circuit court of Winnebago county praying that appellant be commanded to issue the permit, and after a hearing by the court an order was entered granting the writ. Lyddon prayed an appeal, and the case is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago Motor Coach Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Michigan-Lake Building Corp. v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Nevins v. City Council of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. People ex rel. Gregory v. StrohmIllinois Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Treadway v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Landmarks Preservation Council v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Toomey v. Norwood Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Traders Development Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Condominium Ass'n of Commonwealth Plaza v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API