Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Michael J. Guinan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 30, 1993No. 92-2832Published

1ConcurrenceEasterbrook, Circuit Judge

Like my colleagues, I yearn for a system under which one appeal resolves the entire case. Unfortunately, ineffective assistance of counsel eludes once-and-for-all disposition. Trial counsel cannot be expected to attack his own performance, and a new lawyer representing the defendant on appeal finds that it is impossible to upset a conviction by pointing to his predecessor’s actions. Why impossible? Because the absence of a complete record prevents definitive action. No matter how odd or deficient trial counsel’s performance may seem, that lawyer may have had a reason for acting as he did.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API