Legal Opinion

Miaskiewicz v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 14, 1980PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

The petitioner, Stanley J. Miaskiewicz, was the plaintiff in a civil action tried before a jury in the Superior Court. After the trial, which lasted eleven days and resulted in a verdict for the defendant, the judge found that the petitioner’s testimony “was a tissue of fabrications which was knowingly undertaken, which tended to baffle the inquiry at hand, which degraded and obstructed the administration of justice and which interfered with the capacity of the Court and jury to determine the rights of the parties according to law.” The judge found the petitioner guilty of petty criminal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Blankenburg v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Katz v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Sussman v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GurneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Department of Youth Services v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. LeavittMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Miaskiewicz v. LeTourneauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. VieraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API