Legal Opinion

Ingle v. Clinchfield Railroad

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 23, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The plaintiff in the court below who is now the plaintiff in error, instituted his action at law against the Clinchfield Railroad Company for damages for the wrongful death of Louise Ingle, his infant daughter, who was killed on the railroad track by an engine of a freight train operated by the defendant. After all of the evidence had been concluded, the defendant demurred to the evidence, the court sustained the demurrer, and entered a judgment for the defendant.

The considerations tó be entertained by the court and the principles of law controlling the decision upon a demurrer to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hortenstein v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Nichols' Adm'r v. W. O. & W. R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Denny's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. DavesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Canada Contracting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. FaisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Way v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  5. Lasley v. HyltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API