Doe v. Mastoloni
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON FACULTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND REVOKE ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiffs Jane Doe, John Doe, and J.D.,1 and individual defendants Tanya Mastoloni, Rebecca Kessler, Christopher Esposito, and Laura Sullivan, faculty members of co-defendant Avon Public Schools, have filed cross-motions pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The individual defendants (“Faculty Defendants”) move for a court order sanctioning Plaintiffs for inadequate document production by dismissing their claims or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Pennie & Edmonds LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Kiobel v. MillsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Ransmeier v. UAL CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Andrews v. DragoiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Anglin v. WilkieDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2025
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. Dinesh Verma Medical, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Hanna v. American Cruise Lines, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Ramos v. HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.