Legal Opinion
Andrews v. WK Company
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 3, 1939No. Civ. 2450PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a demurrer of the W. K. Company to a second amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
The demurrer was both general and special. It is clear from the ruling of the trial judge that it was sustained without leave to amend because, in his opinion, no cause of action was stated against any defendant. The specifications of uncertainty, ambiguity, and unintelligibility in the demurrer are not argued. We therefore assume that they have been abandoned.
The plaintiffs are landowners or have interests in lands in the Huntington Beach oil…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Rolapp v. Federal Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Moss v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kuklies v. ReinertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Petroleum Exchange Inc. v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Dowd v. GlennCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.