Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Firman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 1965No. 64-901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

177 So.2d 560 (1965)

Henry B. PEACOCK, Jr., Appellant,

v.

Helen E. FIRMAN, Appellee.

No. 64-901.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 1, 1965.

On Rehearing August 17, 1965.

Dawes & Lummus, Miami, for appellant.

Smith & Mandler; Miami Beach, and Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellee.

Before TILLMAN PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant, Henry B. Peacock, Jr., was the defendant in the trial court to a complaint in which the appellee Helen E. Firman prayed for a partnership accounting. In addition, the appellee alleged in her complaint that she had turned over…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wadlington v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Van Meter v. KelseySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Grapes v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. Bethea v. LangfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Walker v. LandressSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hiestand v. GeierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Suave Shoe Corp. v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Smith v. BranchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Fisher v. CreamerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Yawn v. BlackwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API