Legal Opinion

Bethea v. Langford

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 18, 1949PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants have appealed from a final decree in favor of the plaintiff which declared and enforced a resulting trust in and to a one-third interest in certain lands and decreed an accounting between the parties.

The theory of the bill filed by the plaintiff Langford was that the lands involved were purchased by the defendant Elmer Bethea at a tax deed sale, with money owned jointly by the plaintiff and the defendant, as joint adventurers or copartners, with the express oral understanding and agreement between the parties that the land would be bought in by Bethea for and in the name of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Geter v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Anderson v. NorthropSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Lofton v. SterrettSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  4. Marshall v. C. S. Young Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Johnston v. SherehouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Baskin v. GriffithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Appalachian, Inc. v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Wiggins v. Lykes Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. City of Miami v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API