Legal Opinion

Ball & Socket Fastener Co. v. Cohn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 5, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

These are two suits in equity by the Ball & Socket Fastener Company against Julius Cohn and others, each for the infringement of a patent, and for an accounting, and the.recovery of damages for unfair competition in trade. Heard on demurrers to the bills.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

One suit is brought for alleged infringement of patent No. 604,637,- applied for June 20, 1895, dated May 24, 1898, and granted to William S. Richardson, assignor to the plaintiff, for an improvement in detachable fasteners for gloves and garments. The other is brought for alleged infringement of design patent No. 27,865, applied for April 29, 1897, dated November 16, 1897, granted to William S. Richardson .for a design for the socket member *665of - such fasteners, and assigned, with back damages for infringement, May 20, 1898, to the plaintiff. Each bill, besides,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jaros Hygienic Underwear Co. v. Fleece Hygienic Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Kirk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Rein v. ClaytonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1889
  4. Adee v. Peck Bros. & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. T. B. Woods Sons Co. v. Valley Iron WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Johnston v. Brass Goods Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1912
  3. Allen v. Walton Wood & Metal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API