Cullum v. Seagull Mid-South, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This is an appeal by class representatives, Bill Cullum and Darnell Cullum, on behalf of a class of Arkla, Inc. ratepayers. They appeal from an order dismissing their civil law causes of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In doing so, they urge various errors but primarily contend that the circuit court had jurisdiction of the tort actions and of their petition for declaratory relief. We disagree and hold that this litigation constituted an impermissible collateral attack on Arkla rates filed with and approved by the Arkansas Public Service Commission.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wegoland Ltd. v. NYNEX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Taffet v. Southern Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Oglesby v. Baptist Medical SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- City of El Dorado v. Ark. Public Service Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brandon v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Qwest Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Austin v. Centerpoint Energy ArklaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Bryant v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Centerpoint Energy, Inc. v. MILLER COUNTY CIRCUIT SECOND DIV.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.