Legal Opinion

Intel Corp. v. Renfro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 96-02773, 95-11919; CA A98921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which set aside the denial of an aggravation claim. Central to the Board’s holding was its determination that, because of the 1995 amendment to ORS 656.273(1), claimant was not required to prove diminished wage-earning capacity in order to establish a compensable aggravation of an unscheduled condition. We conclude that the Board erred in that regard and, consequently, reverse and remand.

Claimant suffered a grievous head injury when she fell down a flight of steps while working for employer in July 1982. She consequently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. EggmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Sutton v. Dennis 7 Dees LandscapeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API