Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Sieloff v. Golz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1977No. 75-478, 75-512, No. 76-321PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The resolution of each of these three appeals requires an examination of the provisions of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act (sec. 976.03, Stats.), art. IV, sec. 2, of the United States Constitution, and 18 U.S.C., sec. 3182.
Although the factual posture of each case differs, the underlying problems of each case are controlled by the same established law and by the same rationale. Each of these cases reviews a determination of a habeas corpus court which inquired into the detention of a prisoner challenging an extradition warrant issued by the Governor of the State of Wisconsin.
In State ex…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jaben v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. PaszekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Phelps v. Physicians InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. McMillian v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- State v. KerrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LeitnerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Pfeifer v. World Service Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.