United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KESSLER, District Judge.
Defendants have filed an Emergency Motion to Prohibit Plaintiffs Untimely Addition of 650 New Racketeering Acts to the Case (“Emergency Motion”).1 Upon consideration of the Motion, the Government’s Opposition, the Reply, and the entire record herein, the Court concludes that the Motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
As all parties know, the Government’s Complaint, filed on September 22, 1999, was accompanied by an Appendix listing 116 “Racketeering Acts” of mail or wire fraud allegedly committed by the Defendants.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. John M. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. EufrasioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. CoonanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. KroutCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy SweetonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norden v. SamperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Novak v. Capital Management & Development Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Staggers v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2024