Legal Opinion

Staggers v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 15, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2015-0392Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES ex rel. MELLISSA ) STAGGERS and RHONDA ) KURDELMEYER, ) ) Plaintiffs-Relators, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-392 (TSC/GMH) ) MEDTRONIC, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this qui tam action against Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Medtronic”) under the False Claims Act,

31 U.S.C. § 3729

et seq., Plaintiffs-Relators Melissa Staggers and Rhonda Kurdelmeyer (“Relators”) have filed a motion seeking to modify an order—proposed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
In Re Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Limited, Inc., Sears Roebuck & Company, Safeway Inc., Circuit City Stores, Inc., National Retail Federation and the Food Marketing Institute, International Mass Retail Association, and All Similarly Situated Persons v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. And Mastercard International IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
Rafaela Cortes-Irizarry v. Corporacin Insular De SegurosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.