Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. McNeil

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Fountain Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

Dunlap brought an action in the court below against Scott McNeil, John R. McNeil, and Newton W. Davidson, alleging in his complaint 'that Scott McNeil and Davidson were partners; that they dissolved partnership; and that as a part of the consideration for so doing, the remaining partner, Scott McNeil, with John R. McNeil as his surety, executed the following agreement to Davidson, viz.:

“Harveysburgh, Ind., Sept. 15th, 1868.
“ I do hei-eby agree to N. W. Davidson to pay all debts against the firm of Davidson & McNeil.

Scott McNeil.

Security, John R. McNeil.”

It is further alleged that the firm of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Devol v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. McMillan v. Bull's Head BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Warren v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Vandalia Railway Co. v. KeysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Carpenter v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API