Legal Opinion
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 2005No. 01-35450PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1166Opinion by Judge FISHER; Concurrence by Judges KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge BEA.
FISHER, Circuit Judge,
with whom Chief Judge SCHROEDER and Judges PREGERSON, HAWKINS, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON join concurring; Judge KOZINSKI, concurring in the result.
This appeal requires us to consider whether the use of an integration tiebreaker in the open choice, noncompetitive, public high school assignment plan crafted by Seattle School District Number 1 (the “District”) violates the federal Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Our review is guided by the principles articulated in the Supreme Court’s…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Frank Marvin Phillips v. Lynn Hust, Library StaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Friery v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Teague ex rel. T.T. v. Arkansas Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2012
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Civil Liberties Union v. LomaxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.