Friery v. Los Angeles Unified School District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We have been asked to consider whether a school district’s race-conscious faculty transfer policy violates either the California or federal constitutions. 1 Before we reach the merits of the claim, we must first consider whether the plaintiff has standing to bring suit. Because we conclude that the record is insufficiently developed to determine whether there is Article' III standing, we remand to the district court for the limited purpose of finding facts and making a determination of the plaintiffs standing. 2
I
James Friery, the plaintiff-appellant, is a physical education instructor at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grutter v. BollingerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Lipitor Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Vaughn v. Consumer Home Mortg. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- United States v. LazarenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.