Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Buren

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1998No. 1998-1729Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 84 Ohio St.3d 271.] DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BUREN. [Cite as Dayton Bar Assn. v. Buren,

1998-Ohio-552.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Disbarment—Engaging in continuing course of deceit, misrepresentation, and neglect of duty to clients and bankruptcy court. (No. 98-1729—Submitted September 29, 1998—Decided December 30, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 97-33. __________________ {¶ 1} In December 1997, relator, Dayton Bar Association, filed a seven- count…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SuarezOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SuarezOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API