Legal Opinion
de Bearn v. de Bearn
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 8, 1913No. 558; No. 559; No. 560; No. 561PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Maryland.'
1Per curiam
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. (Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672; Adams v. Russell, 229 U. S. 358, and authorities there cited; Hamblin v. Western Land Co., 147 U. S. 531; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; see De Bearn v. De Bearn, 225 U. S. 695.)
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hamblin v. Western Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Adams v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wood v. ChesboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1914