Legal Opinion

Otto v. L. L. Coryell & Son

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1942No. 31330PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an equity action, brought to reform or cancel a written instrument, and for an accounting. After trial in the district court, a decree was entered, finding that the plaintiff was not entitled to the relief asked for in his petition, and the action was therefore dismissed, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*499The amended petition with the exhibits attached makes up 40 pages of the transcript, and is too long to be set out at length in this opinion. It is charged therein that the attorney for L. L. Coryell & Son drafted a written instrument which purported to evidence an oral agreement…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greusel v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Slobodisky v. Phenix Insurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Neary v. General American Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Paine-Fishburn Granite Co. v. ReynoldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Garner v. City of AuroraNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Miller v. KnightNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Lovenburg v. JusticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API