Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. . Polakavetz

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Plaintiff brought action in Montgomery County, before the clerk and against the defendant, on 7 April, 1925, and sued out the provisional or ancillary remedy of claim and delivery, made the usual affidavit and bond and had the sheriff to seize “one wood saw, frame and all attachments thereto belonging, bought from J. Polakavetz by the said bankrupt, M. J. Blaylock.” The sheriff, after holding the property three days, defendant giving no undertaking, turned same over to plaintiff.

On 4 May, 1925, the plaintiff before the clerk took a voluntary non-suit.

On 14 September, 1925, over four months…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yelverton v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Beck v. . Wilkins-Ricks CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Peyton v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. York v. Westall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Sutton v. . RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hardin v. KCS International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Penn Dixie Lines, Inc. v. GrannickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Bohannon v. TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Bohannon v. . TrotmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API