Mansell v. City of New Cordell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DICKSON, 0.
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and the defendants in error were defendants in the court below, and will hereafter be so designated.
On May 1, 1925, the plaintiffs commenced this action in the district court of Washita county to enjoin the governing body and the defendant city of New Cordell and J. H. Baldwin from carrying out a contr.act entered into pursuant to a paving ordinance.
The material allegations of the plaintiffs’ petition are that the defendant city of New Cordell is a municipal corporation operating as a city of the first class in Washita county,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johns v. City of PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Stockton v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- McBean v. RedickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Lincoln v. HartsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Manley v. City of MarshfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Decker v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- City of New Cordell v. MansellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of New Cordell v. MansellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931