Legal Opinion

Valisano v. Continental Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 35,311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

A dwelling house in the city of "Wakefield, Michigan, owned by plaintiff Anton Yalisano, was insured in each of the four defendant insurance companies. The amount of the policies aggregated the sum of $3,800. Valisano had been insane since 1913 and his property was being looked after by his wife, Mary, who has brought suit as his next.friend; She obtained the insurance from defendants’ agent, who knew of Valisano’s insanity both at the timó the policies were issued and for many years previous thereto.

On May 8, 1928, a fire occurred, resulting, it is claimed, in a total, loss. Mrs. Valisano…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Houseman v. Home InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Reed v. Loyal Protective Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Concordia Fire Insurance v. WaterfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Rott v. Westchester Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dean v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Edwards v. St Mary's HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Reingold v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API