Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albert Miller & Co. v. Corte

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 24, 1939No. 9065Published

1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge

1 think the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. Under the case of Erie Railroad Company v. Tompkins,1 we are bound by the Alabama law, which is so clear, full, and explicit as to render it unnecessary for us to look elsewhere for guidance.

The principal question on this appeal is whether or not the alleged publication was libellous per se. That issue was presented with meticulous care by the complaint; it was met pointedly by the demurrer; it was decided by the court below before the new federal rules of civil procedure became effective, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; and,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Marion v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Ry. Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Age-Herald Publishing Co. v. WatermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API