Marion v. Davis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, X
Words falsely imputing to a woman a want of chastity, whether oral or written,- are .by statute made prima facie malicious, and -are actionable per se. Code of 1923, § 7359. But we have no statute extending this degree of protection to persons of the male sex, and, in determining whether or not plaintiff has stated a cause of action in any one or inore of the counts of his complaint, .we must look- to the rules of the common law applicable in such cases.
The right to the enjoyment of a private reputation, unassailed by malicious slander, is of ancient origin, and is necessary to human…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Phillips v. BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Labor Review Publishing Co. v. GalliherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Fitzpatrick v. Age-Herald Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Butler v. Town of ArgoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Pickett v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Nelson v. Lapeyrouse Grain Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Cook v. East Shore Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Delta Health Group, Inc. v. StaffordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.