Legal Opinion

Baker Ice Machine Co. v. Pinnick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 20, 1934No. 24651PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This original proceeding involves a review of an award of the State Industrial Commission. The only question for review is whether or not the injured employee was at the time of his injury in the employment of the Baker Ice Machine Company, petitioner herein.

The facts present no substantial conflict. It appears that W- B. Mohr purchased an ice plant from the Baker Ice Machine' Company. This plant was to be shipped to Mr. Mohr at Tulsa, where it was to be installed and erected, the company guaranteeing under a written contract that the plant when erected should maintain a capacity to make 25…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Mastin v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Nichols v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API