Legal Opinion

Mastin v. Black

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1936No. 26137PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

On January 25,1935, the State Industrial Commission made an award in favor of Floyd Black, hereinafter referred to as claimant, and against Admiralty Zinc Company, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, and Consolidated Underwriters, hereinafter referred to as insurance carrier.

To review that award, petitioner and insurance carrier have filed1 herein their separate petitions urging numerous grounds for vacating the award. Under our view of the record presented here, it is necessary to consider and determine but one question, that is, whether the relationship of master and servant existed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker Ice Machine Co. v. PinnickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carbajal v. Precision Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. Sartin v. Moran-Buckner Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Reeves v. Muskogee Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Colvin v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Nichols v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API