West Twelfth Street Road Improvement District No. 30 v. Kinstley
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
The basis for appellant’s petition for mandamus is set out therein and abstracted in an opinion of this court, West Twelfth Street, etc., Dist. v. Kinstley, 188 Ark. 77, 63 S. W. (2d) 980. Reference is made to that opinion for a statement of the facts, and such other facts as are necessary for an understanding of the issues involved will he hereafter stated.
In that opinion we said: “In support of the action of the circuit court sustaining the demurrer, the appellee contends that the orders of the county court upon which the petition was based were void for the reason that such orders were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Church v. GallicSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Fourche River Lumber Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Ederheimer v. Carson Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Newton v. AltheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leggett v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Lewis v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Leggett v. KirbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960