Legal Opinion

Rashaw v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is an action to recover for injuries received at the Welden Street crossing in the city of St. Albans on the evening of May 15, 1933. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The only exception briefed is to the refusal of the court to grant defendant’s motion for a directed verdict upon the ground of plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

This crossing is in the railroad yard 500 to 600 feet south of the passenger station. There are twelve tracks which cross the highway substantially north and south. The main line is straight for over a mile toward the south, and is the seventh track…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. Montpelier & Wells River RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Harrington v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Lefebvre's Admr. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  5. Bates v. Rutland Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ZubikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Starr's Transportation, Inc. v. St. Johnsbury & Lamoille County RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  3. Philip Davis v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API