Legal Opinion

Danberg v. Langman

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. 16828. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

The bill in this case was filed by appellees, as complainants, against defendants, (appellants,) for the specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. A general demurrer to the bill was filed by appellants. The court overruled the demurrer, and appellants refusing to answer further, a decree was entered as prayed in the bill. This appeal is prosecuted from that decree.

The substance of the material facts as set out in the bill are, that on April 12, 1924, A. Langman, as party of the first part, and Frank Danberg, as party of the second part, entered into a contract by which Langman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bond v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gibson v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. BrubakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Blair v. VanblarcumIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Larson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Vargas v. Esquire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  4. Home Federal Savings and Loan Association of Chicago v. Republic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. First Commodity Traders, Inc. v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API