Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Churchill

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 2, 1969No. 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, J.

This is a personal injury case arising out of a collision between two motor vehicles. The defendants pleaded general denial and contributory negligence. Under 12 V.S.A. §1024, contributory negligence is now an affirmative defense to be set forth and established by the defendant. At the opening of the trial the action was discontinued as to defendant Morris L. Cote. The case was tried in the Washington County Court at which time the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant, Churchill, and judgment was entered thereon.

The question raised by the plaintiff’s appeal is to the court’s denial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grow v. WolcottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  2. Dashnow v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  3. Russell v. PilgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  4. Towle v. St. Albans Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Smith v. GroveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Evarts v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  2. Larmay v. VanEttenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  3. Allen v. Burlington Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  4. McCormack v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Eddins v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API