Legal Opinion

Araujo v. Coachella Valley Water District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 14, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01800Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARISSA ARAUJO (SURVIVAL Case No.: 20-cv-01800-AJB-RBM ACTION), et al., 12 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT Plaintiffs, 13 COUNTY OF IMPERIAL’S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 15 DISTRICT; THE COUNTY OF (Doc. No. 59) 16 IMPERIAL; JOSUE GONZALEZ; and DOES 1 TO 25, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 19 DISTRICT, 20 Cross-Complainant, 21 v. 22 ANDRE DOS-SANTOS DE-SA, an 23 individual; COUNTY OF IMPERIAL, a Public Entity; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 24 25 Cross-Defendants. 26 27…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API