Falconaero Enterprise, Inc. v. Valley Investment Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a quiet title judgment for plaintiff. Affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.
Defendant urges that the complaint did not state a cause of action, but it appears to us that it satisfied the rules of pleading. Next, it is asserted that because of a dissolution of the plaintiff corporation, it had no standing in court, which seems to *78be answered by Title 16-10-100, 16-10-101, Utah Code Annotated 1953. As to the claim plaintiff was barred by res judicata, we think it to be without merit, if for no other reason than that plaintiff and its privies perfected their title…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Judd v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Falconaero Enterprise, Inc. v. BowersUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Judd v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017