Legal Opinion
Floyd v. AMF Tuboscope, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1990No. 89CA1833PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROTHENBERG.
In this workers’’ compensation case, claimant, Jerry L. Floyd, contests a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) determining that his employer’s FICA tax payments are not included in claimant’s average weekly wage. We affirm.
In Gregory v. Crown Transportation, 776 P.2d 1163 (Colo.App.1989), we held that an employer’s FICA tax payments do not qualify as an “advantage” within the statutory definition of wages under § 8-47-101(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B) (now codified at § 8-40-201(19), C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.)). Gregory is dispositive of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kinterknecht v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Stevenson v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- In Re Marriage of PopeColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Gregory v. Crown TransportationColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Erakovic v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Arapahoe Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Celebrity Custom Builders v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Meeker v. Provenant Health PartnersColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Erakovic v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.