Legal Opinion

Winne v. Fanning

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for extra allowance..

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

The defendants move for an extra allowance of costs.

The action was brought to set aside certain judgments and to declare certain conveyances and liens to be subject to a mortgage held by the plaintiff. The defendants interposed a demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained, With costs to be. taxed, with leave to the plaintiff to amend his-complaint and pay- such costs within twenty days after service of notice of entry of interlocutory judgment, and in case of his failure so to do defendants to have final judgment against the plaintiff sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the complaint,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarke v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Martin v. McCormickThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  3. Van Rensselaer v. KiddNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Vietor v. HalsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hammel v. Camp Ranger, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API