Legal Opinion

United States v. Roper

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2003No. 03-3630Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Roberto Roper appeals a district court judgment that denied his motion to correct his federal criminal sentence. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Following a jury trial in the district court in 1993, Roper was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, making a false statement to obtain a firearm, felon in possession of a firearm, making a false statement to obtain a passport, and two counts of laundering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Hubert R. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Keenan Kester CofieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Leonard SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Walter A. NiemiecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Roberto RoperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API