Legal Opinion

Hasse Contracting Co. v. KBK Financial, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1999No. 24,790PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

{1} In this interpleader action, a subcontractor on a state highway construction project deposited with the district court a sum of money that is claimed by both a financing company and a materials supplier on the project. The district court determined that the supplier was entitled to the money. The Court of Appeals affirmed, adopting an apparently unqualified public policy preference for suppliers over other creditors, including secured creditors. See Hasse Contracting Co. v. KBK Fin., Inc., 1998-NMCA-038, ¶¶ 27-33, 125 N.M. 17, 956 P.2d 816. Because we conclude…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gardner-Zemke Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Orcutt v. S & L Paint Contractors, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Pioneer Savings & Trust, F.A. v. RueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Tom Growney Equipment Co. v. JouettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re: Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc., Debtor. Appeal Of: Daiwa Special Asset CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance v. PulisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Boradiansky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API