Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1912No. 7455PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error • to Prozwrs County Court. — Pión. W. E. • Fee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill

Upon appeal to the county court the defendant in error was tried for the violation of a city ordinance of the town of Lamar, which prohibited the sale of intoxicating liquors. By an instruction he was found not guilty. The people upon the relation of the town bring the case here for review upon error.

It stands admitted that at the time of the alleged sale, and all times .since, the town of Lamar was anti-saloon territory by reason of the result of an election authorized by general sections 4094-41 n, Revised Statutes, 1908, commonly known as the Local Option Act. These facts were the reason…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Hughes v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. People v. WadeMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HorvatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Curley v. Town of MarbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API