Legal Opinion

Victaulic Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 26, 2018No. A146617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, Acting P.J.

*951Victaulic Company (Victaulic), a manufacturer of plumbing products, sued its insurers in connection with nine product liability claims against Victaulic that resulted in litigation. Following a favorable ruling for Victaulic on summary adjudication (potential for coverage and thus a duty to defend) and then a favorable ruling in a court trial for declaratory relief (duty to indemnify), the case proceeded to a jury trial on Victaulic's claim of bad faith. That trial lasted three and one-half weeks, during which numerous witnesses testified and over 100 exhibits were introduced.

One of those…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API