Victaulic Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, Acting P.J.
*951Victaulic Company (Victaulic), a manufacturer of plumbing products, sued its insurers in connection with nine product liability claims against Victaulic that resulted in litigation. Following a favorable ruling for Victaulic on summary adjudication (potential for coverage and thus a duty to defend) and then a favorable ruling in a court trial for declaratory relief (duty to indemnify), the case proceeded to a jury trial on Victaulic's claim of bad faith. That trial lasted three and one-half weeks, during which numerous witnesses testified and over 100 exhibits were introduced.
One of those…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- People v. BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. CotsirilosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020