Legal Opinion
Tomaszewski v. Cleveland
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph P. Kuszynski, J.
Defendants William Cleveland and Gloria Martinez move this court for a dismissal of the actions pending against them on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction.
While defendants do not specify whether this motion is for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, or for failure of *356personal jurisdiction under CPLR 3211 (subd 8) or in rem jurisdiction under CPLR 3211 (subd 9), this court treats this motion as being under CPLR 3211.
This action arises out of an alleged accident which occurred on July 27, 1975 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Plaintiff Lottie…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seider v. RothNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Epstein v. SirivejkulNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Epstein v. SirivejkulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mokhiber v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Mokhiber v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Menefee v. Floyd & Beasley Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Tomaszewski v. ClevelandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Chesley v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.