Chesley v. Union Carbide Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1ConcurrenceAltimari, Circuit Judge
I concur in affirming the district judge’s denial of appellants’ attorneys’ fee applications but write separately because the majority has adopted an incomplete analysis of this issue.
This Court previously affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the underlying action for which attorneys’ fees are now sought. We stated:
Once [the district court] dismisses [the United States] proceedings on grounds of forum non conveniens it ceases to have any further jurisdiction over the mat-ter_ The concept of shared jurisdictions is both illusory and unrealistic. The parties cannot simultaneously submit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- in All Cases which have been Consolidated into this Proceeding by Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Grimes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Reiser v. Del Monte Properties Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. Cpc Acquisition Company, Inc., Paul A. Bilzerian, and Bilzerian and Brodovsky, Paul A. Bilzerian, Bilzerian and Brodovsky, a California Partnership, and Cpc Acquisition Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., a New York Corporation, Gordon E. Allen, Robert E. Allen, Richard Q. Armstrong, Howard L. Clark, John C. Emery, Jr., E. Hervey Evans, Jr., Richard L. Gelb, Floyd D. Hall, Henry H. Henley, Jr., Robert J. McDonald William T. Seawell, Phillip L. Smith, and John L. Weinberg, Paul A. Bilzerian, Bilzerian and Brodovsky, a California Partnership, and Cpc Acquisition Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Latham & WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.